Legal Opinion
Emeldi v. University of Oregon
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided March 21, 2012No. 10-35551PublishedCited by 80 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Order; Dissent to Order by Chief Judge KOZINSKI; Opinion by Judge GOULD; Dissent by Judge FISHER.
ORDER
The opinion in the above-captioned matter filed on March 21, 2012, and published at 673 F.3d 1218, is amended as follows and is simultaneously filed with this order:
At slip opinion page 3268, line 2, add a footnote after <544 U.S. at 173, 125 S.Ct. 1497. >, stating: <Like the Supreme Court in Jackson, “[w]e do not rely on regulations extending Title IX’s protection beyond its statutory limits.” 544 U.S. at 178, 125 S.Ct. 1497. Our decision rests on “the statute itself,” not on regulations…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by80 opinions
- Veronica Ollier v. Sweetwater Union High SchoolCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- Jane Doe v. Mercy Catholic Medical CenterCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2017
- Brandon Austin v. University of OregonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
- Doe v. School District Number 1Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2020
- Doe v. Salisbury UniversityDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2015
75 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.