Legal Opinion
FTC v. Qualcomm Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided August 11, 2020No. 19-16122PublishedCited by 76 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, No. 19-16122 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. v. 5:17-cv-00220- LHK QUALCOMM INCORPORATED, A Delaware corporation, Defendant-Appellant, OPINION SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS COMPANY, LTD.; SAMSUNG SEMICONDUCTOR INC.; INTEL CORPORATION; ERICSSON, INC.; SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC.; MEDIATEK INC.; APPLE INC., Intervenors, NOKIA TECHNOLOGIES OY; INTERDIGITAL, INC.; LENOVO (UNITED STATES), INC.; MOTOROLA MOBILITY LLC, Intervenors. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of…
2Cases cited64 opinions
- United States v. Grinnell Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Brunswick Corp. v. Pueblo Bowl-O-Mat, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Brown Shoe Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Eastman Kodak Co. v. Image Technical Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by76 opinions
- Epic Games, Inc. v. Apple, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2023
- Coronavirus Reporter v. Apple, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2023
- Andrew Harrington v. Cracker Barrel Old Country Store, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2025
- Optronic Technologies, Inc. v. Ningbo Sunny Electronic Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021
- Karen Stromberg v. Qualcomm Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021
71 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.