Legal Opinion
Ventress v. Japan Airlines
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided April 30, 2010No. 08-15731, 08-16122PublishedCited by 80 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GOODWIN, Senior Circuit Judge:
This pro se appeal tenders the only legal questions that remain in flight engineer Martin Ventress’s dispute with Japan Airlines and its subsidiary Jalways Co., Ltd. (collectively, “JAL”) and Hawaii Aviation Contract Services, Inc. (“HACS”) following the remand to the District of Hawaii in his first appeal to this court. See Ventress v. Japan Airlines, 486 F.3d 1111 (9th Cir. 2007) (Ventress I).
In Ventress I, we held that the Friendship, Commerce, and Navigation Treaty, U.S.-Japan, April 2, 1953, 4 U.S.T.2063, does not preempt California’s whistle blower…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Shaw v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Medtronic, Inc. v. LohrSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Morales v. Trans World Airlines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Fort Halifax Packing Co. v. CoyneSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- James Chappel v. Laboratory Corporation of America, AKA National Health LabCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by80 opinions
- P. Victor Gonzalez v. Planned Parenthood of LaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- Martin Ventress v. Japan AirlinesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- John Watson, V v. Air Methods CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2017
- Janet v. MarshallNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2013
- Ulysse v. AAR Aircraft Component ServicesDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2012
75 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.