Legal Opinion

Tepper v. Wilkins

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 19, 2017No. B269900PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

PERLUSS, P. J.

Belinda Wilkins Tepper sued her three siblings, Geoffrey Wilkins, Martha Wilkins and Derek Wilkins, on behalf of her 88-year-old mother, Eileen Wilkins, claiming her siblings’ actions individually and while serving as trustees of Eileen’s 1 revocable living trust constituted financial abuse of an elder or dependent adult. Tepper’s siblings demurred to her first amended complaint, asserting Tepper lacked standing to pursue an action on Eileen’s behalf. Eileen, separately represented by counsel, intervened in the action and joined the demurrer to Tepper’s amended complaint.…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Schifando v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Zelig v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
  3. McCall v. PacifiCare of California, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Evans v. City of BerkeleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Loeffler v. Target CorporationCalifornia Supreme Court · 2014

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Redfearn v. Trader Joe's Co., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
  2. Sierra Palms Homeowners Ass'n v. Metro Gold Line Foothill Extension Constr. Auth., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
  3. Hasbun v. O'Connor CA2/7California Court of Appeal · 2021
  4. Holland v. Silverscreen Healthcare, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2024
  5. Lee v. Foris Dax, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2025

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API