Legal Opinion
Redding v. Oldewartel
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided August 25, 1987No. C4-87-655PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*233OPINION
A. PAUL LOMMEN, Acting Judge.
Appellants seek reversal of the trial court’s judgment holding that a judicial lien granted respondent in 1986 was prior to pre-existing liens granted appellants Windom State Bank and G.A. Redding in 1985. We affirm.
FACTS
The marriage of James R. Redding (“James”) and respondent Louise Oldewur-tel was dissolved by judgment and decree dated September 4,1984. In its August 24, 1984 findings, conclusions and order for judgment, the trial court ruled that the farm in which James and his sister each had an undivided one-half interest, was nonmarital property. All…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Betlach v. Wayzata CondominiumSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- Hunt v. Nevada State BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1969
- Hardy v. MatthewsSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Marriage of DeLa Rosa v. DeLa RosaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
- Van De Loo v. Van De LooCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Marriage of Oldewurtel v. ReddingSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- Fraser v. FraserCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2002
- Marriage of Oldewurtel v. ReddingSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988