Legal Opinion
Fraser v. Fraser
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided March 19, 2002No. C6-01-812, C8-01-813PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HANSON, Judge.
Appellant-wife and respondent-husband bought a house on contract-for-deed from husband’s father. 1 After husband brought an action to dissolve the marriage, father gave notice of the cancellation of the contract for deed. Initially, the district court joined father as a third-party respondent in the dissolution action and enjoined him from canceling the contract for deed. On reconsideration, the district court vacated the injunction and held that it lacked personal jurisdiction over father and subject matter jurisdiction over his property rights; that its order enjoining…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Hauser v. MealeySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
- Fritz v. WarthenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
- Dahlberg v. YoungSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
- AMRESCO Residential Mortgage Corp. v. StangeCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2001
- Marriage of Oldewurtel v. ReddingSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Real Estate Equity Strategies, LLC v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2006
- Thomas A. Foster & Associates, Ltd. v. PaulsonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2005
- Bjorklund v. Bjorklund Trucking, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2008
- Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation v. Gary E. Mitchell, John DoeCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2015
- Brown v. Grant Holding, LLCDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2005
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.