Legal Opinion

Marriage of Oldewurtel v. Redding

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided April 8, 1988No. C4-87-655Published

1Opinion of the Court

421 N.W.2d 722 (1988)

In re the Marriage of Louise Ann OLDEWURTEL, a.k.a. Louise Ann Redding, Respondent,

v.

James Alan REDDING, Lower Court Respondent,

G.A. Redding, et al., petitioners, Appellants.

No. C4-87-655.

Supreme Court of Minnesota.

April 8, 1988.

Rehearing Denied May 17, 1988.

Jack M. Fribley, Minneapolis, for appellants.

Lisa E. Doering, Lisa Ray, Bloomington, for respondent.

Heard, considered and decided by the court en banc.

OPINION

AMDAHL, Chief Justice.

This appeal represents another step in a protracted dissolution proceeding. The plaintiff, respondent, Louise Ann [Redding] Oldewurtel[1]…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Hunt v. Nevada State BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1969
  2. Hardy v. MatthewsSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Jeanine M. BOYD, F/K/A Jeanine Boyd Robinson, Appellant, v. Bruce G. ROBINSON, AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1984
  4. Warner v. WarnerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
  5. Gau v. HylandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1950

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API