Legal Opinion
Lytes v. District of Columbia Water & Sewer Authority
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided December 13, 2007No. Civil Action 05-402 (RMC)PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
ROSEMARY M. COLLYER, District Judge.
Floyd E. Lytes claims that the District of Columbia Water and Sewer Authority (“WASA”) discriminated against him when it refused to return him to work as a Wastewater Treatment Plant Operator and then terminated him, allegedly because of his physical disability. At the close of discovery, WASA moves for summary judgment on Count II of the Complaint, the only remaining claim in this case, which Mr. Lytes resists. The Court concludes that Mr. Lytes was not “disabled” within the meaning of the Americans with Disability Act (“ADA”), 42 U.S.C.…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Sutton v. United Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Toyota Motor Manufacturing, Kentucky, Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Francis J. Kelly v. Drexel UniversityCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1996
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Lytes v. DC Water and Sewer AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2009
- Etheridge v. Fedchoice Federal Credit UnionDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- Brooks v. ClintonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- Hancock v. Washington Hospital CenterCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2014
- Chisholm v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.