Legal Opinion
Brooks v. Clinton
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided January 30, 2012No. Civil Action No. 2010-0646PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
BERYL A. HOWELL, District Judge.
The plaintiff, Yvonne Brooks, is an African-American woman who worked as an administrative officer for the State Department from November 2003 to March 2007 pursuant to a contract that was renewable in one-year increments for a maximum period of five years. The plaintiffs supervisors decided not to renew her contract following its annual expiration in March 2007. Subsequently, the plaintiff brought this lawsuit against the State Department (“State”) alleging that she was the victim of workplace discrimination. Specifically, the plaintiff…
2Cases cited47 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Scott v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Sutton v. United Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Badwal v. Board of Trustees of the University of the District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- Lockhart v. Coastal International Security, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- Warner v. Vance-CooksDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- Ng v. LahoodDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- Brooks v. ClintonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.