Legal Opinion

Rowley v. Rowley

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 3, 1928No. Appeal, 189PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Sadler,

The plaintiff and defendant were brothers, both engaged in the manufacture of artificial legs, the former doing business for the Best Artificial Limb Company, a Delaware corporation, of which he was the principal stockholder, and the latter having a well established business in Pittsburgh and Youngstown, Ohio. Defendant manufactured a leg under a patent owned by a Chicago company, which had secured from the District Court of the United States an injunction against the Best Company, restraining it from the use of the name “Rowley” in connection with its business.…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Glenn v. TreesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
  2. Williams v. Finlaw, Mueller & Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  3. Miller v. Central Trust & Savings Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
  4. Beaver v. SlaneSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
  5. Coens v. MarousisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. JACKSON v. HendrickSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  2. Schuster v. LargmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  3. Houghten v. Restland Memorial Park, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
  4. Hendrick v. JacksonCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  5. Frazier v. MansfieldSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API