Legal Opinion

JACKSON v. Hendrick

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 1, 1974No. Appeal, 298PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Robebts,

Appellants, on behalf of themselves and all others confined in Philadelphia prisons, commenced this action seeking equitable relief from the allegedly unconstitutional conditions existing in the Philadelphia prison system. After taking extensive testimony, a special three-judge court found that confinement in Philadelphia prisons constituted cruel and unusual punishment. The court made findings of fact, conclusions of law, and entered a decree nisi. After appellees’ exceptions were overruled, the decree was made final.

Appeal to the Commonwealth Court 1 resulted…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Brown v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  2. Swann v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Smuck v. HobsonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1969
  4. Lawrence J. Holt v. Robert Sarver, Commissioner of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1971
  5. Holt v. SarverDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1970

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. StanleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  2. Harris v. City of PhiladelphiaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
  3. Harris v. PernsleyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1987
  4. Harris v. PernsleyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
  5. Dawson v. KendrickDistrict Court, S.D. West Virginia · 1981

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API