Legal Opinion

Black v. Cosentino

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided December 26, 1996No. 96CA006406PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Slaby, Judge.

Plaintiffs-appellants, Charles H. and Vicki Black, appeal from the entry of summary judgment in favor of defendants-appellees, Frank and Janice Cosentino and Russell Realtors, in appellants’ lawsuit against the appellees for misrepresentation and concealment in a real estate transaction. We affirm.

In December 1992, Charles and Vicki Black (“appellants”) entered into a purchase agreement with Frank and Janice Cosentino (“sellers”), to purchase the sellers’ forty-year-old North Ridgeville home for $68,200. Russell Realtors and its agent, Mark Kennedy (collectively, “realtor”),…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Mers v. Dispatch Printing Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Burr v. Board of County CommissionersOhio Supreme Court · 1986
  5. State ex rel. Howard v. FerreriOhio Supreme Court · 1994

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. White Consolidated Industries, Inc. v. Westinghouse Electric CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
  2. Roberts v. McCoyOhio Court of Appeals · 2017
  3. Felker v. SchwenkeOhio Court of Appeals · 1998
  4. Kramer v. RatermanOhio Court of Appeals · 2005
  5. Waleszewski v. Angstadt, Unpublished Decision (1-16-2004)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2004

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API