Legal Opinion

Burr v. Board of County Commissioners

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided April 11, 1986No. 85-786PublishedCited by 345 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCelebrezze, C.J.

I

We initially determine whether the court of common pleas possessed subject matter jurisdiction over this action. Appellants contend that the Court of Claims has exclusive jurisdiction over damage claims by adoptive parents asserted against a board of county commissioners and the county welfare department.

Appellants also claim that the trial court erroneously excluded certain evidence which tended to establish state statutory oversight and funding of the county welfare department.2

We disagree with both contentions. The Court of Claims has “* * * exclusive original jurisdiction of all civil…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. C. E. Morris Co. v. Foley Construction Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Cohen v. Lamko, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Upton v. VailNew York Supreme Court · 1810
  4. Foust v. Valleybrook Realty Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1981
  5. Friedland v. LipmanOhio Court of Appeals · 1980

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by345 opinions

  1. Wing v. Anchor Media, Ltd.Ohio Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Mussivand v. DavidOhio Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Gibbs v. ErnstSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  4. Peggy Greenberg and Pamela Rossmann, Individually and on Behalf of Others Similarly Situated v. The Life Insurance Company of VirginiaCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
  5. Foremost Ins. Co. v. ParhamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1997

340 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API