United States Securities & Exchange Commission v. Lauer
District Court, N.D. Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM, OPINION AND ORDER
ANDERSEN, District Judge.
Plaintiff, Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) has filed a motion for preliminary injunction. In their response, defendants John D. Lauer and Clifton Capital Investors L.P. (“CCI”) (hereinafter collectively referred to as “defendants”) have raised a challenge to the jurisdiction of the SEC to bring this action and to the jurisdiction of this court to entertain the case. For the reasons stated below, we deny Lauer and CCI’s challenge to the jurisdiction of this court.
BACKGROUND
Since February 1993, Lauer has been Director of the Risk…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Securities and Exchange Commission v. W. J. Howey Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
- United Housing Foundation, Inc. v. FormanSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Capital Gains Research Bureau, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. C. M. Joiner Leasing Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Reves v. Ernst & YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 98,646 Securities and Exchange Commission v. Michael A. Maio and Patricia C. LadavacCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
- United States v. Crop Growers Corp.District Court, District of Columbia · 1997
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. MarkerDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2006
- United States Securities & Exchange Commission v. BattooDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2016