Legal Opinion
United States Securities & Exchange Commission v. Battoo
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided January 25, 2016No. 1:12-CV-07125PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Honorable Edmond E. Chang, United States District Judge
The United States Securities and Exchange ' Commission brought this federal securities law action against various individual and corporate-entity defendants, asserting that they engaged in a Ponzi scheme to defraud investors.1 The SEC now moves for summary judgment against the one remaining, defendant (the others defaulted), Tracy Sunderlage, for violating Section 15 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 [15 U.S.C. §§ 780(a)(1), 78o(b)(6)(B)(i)] and Section 203(f) of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 [15…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Scott v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Landgraf v. USI Film ProductsSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Traffic Monsoon, LLCDistrict Court, D. Utah · 2017
- Securities and Exchange Commission v. Cutter Financial Group, LLCDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2023
- Securities and Exchange Commission v. Global Investment Strategy UK Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 2021