Reves v. Ernst & Young
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Marshall
This case presents the question whether certain demand notes issued by the Farmers Cooperative of Arkansas and Oklahoma (Co-Op) are “securities” within the meaning of §3(a)(10) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. We conclude that they are.
I
The Co-Op is an agricultural cooperative that, at the time relevant here, had approximately 23,000 members. In order to raise money to support its general business operations, the Co-Op sold promissory notes payable on demand by the holder. Although the notes were uncollateralized and uninsured, they paid a variable rate of interest that was adjusted *59mon…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Securities and Exchange Commission v. W. J. Howey Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
- United Housing Foundation, Inc. v. FormanSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Tcherepnin v. KnightSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. C. M. Joiner Leasing Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
- International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. DanielSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by423 opinions
- Gustafson v. Alloyd Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Reves v. Ernst & YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Republican Party of Minnesota v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Robert J. Guidry v. Bank of Laplace, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1992
- Perrysburg Township v. City of RossfordOhio Supreme Court · 2004
418 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.