Legal Opinion

Smitke v. Travelers Indemnity Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided November 23, 1962No. 38,927PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Rogosheske, Justice.

Appeal from a summary judgment denying coverage to plaintiff under an automobile liability insurance policy. Certain provisions of the basic policy designed to extend coverage for medical expense and for protection against an uninsured motorist to a “relative” of the named insured were made an integral part of the policy. Another provision defines “relative.” The question presented is whether such provisions, which exclude plaintiff, a son of the insured, because of his ownership of a private passenger automobile, are ambiguous or unreasonable and capricious in effect.

There…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hauenstein v. St. Paul-Mercury Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
  2. Phil G. Ruvelson, Inc. v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1951
  3. Wilson v. Travelers Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1943

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Farmers Insurance v. MillerWashington Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Elledge v. WarrenLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1972
  3. Lopez v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.California Court of Appeal · 1967
  4. Commerce Bank v. West Bend Mutual Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2015
  5. Griffith v. Security InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1975

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API