Legal Opinion

Phil G. Ruvelson, Inc. v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided December 7, 1951No. 35,528PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Knutson, Justice.

Appeal from an order sustaining a demurrer to plaintiffs’ amended complaint.

Plaintiffs are engaged in the business of selling jewelry and diamonds to dealers. On October 8, 19á9, defendant issued a policy of insurance to plaintiffs under which it insured plaintiffs for a period of one year against “loss of and/or damage to the above described property [which included the property here involved] or any part thereof arising from any cause whatsoever except as hereinafter mentioned, viz:”

Thereafter follow 12 separate exceptions, including paragraph (I), which is involved in this…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Williams v. Union Central Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. Robinson v. ButlerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1948
  3. Princess Ring Co., Inc. v. Home Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1932
  4. Greenberg v. Rhode Island InsuranceAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1946
  5. William Kinscherf Co. v. Saint Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1931

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Bobich v. OjaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
  2. E.M.M.I. Inc. v. Zurich American InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Telex Corporation v. Data Products CorporationSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1965
  4. Grinnell Mutual Reinsurance v. Roger SchwiegerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2012
  5. Gabrelcik v. National Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1964

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API