Legal Opinion
Griffith v. Security Insurance
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided January 14, 1975PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHouse, C. J.
This case arose from an accident in which the fifteen-year-old plaintiff, Richard Griffith, son of the plaintiffs Granville and Violet Griffith, was injured. The accident involved his bicycle and an uninsured automobile. At the time of the accident, there was in effect an automobile insurance policy issued by the defendant to Gran-ville Griffith. The plaintiffs applied to the Superior Court for an order directing the defendant company to proceed with arbitration in accordance with the provisions of § 52-410 of the General Statutes and the decision of this court in Frager v. Pennsylvania…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Mazzilli v. Acc. & Cas. Ins. Co. of WinterthurSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1961
- State v. PundySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1959
- Brockett v. JensenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1966
- Johnston Jewels, Ltd. v. LeonardSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1968
- Bridgeport Pipe Engineering Co. v. DeMatteo Construction Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1970
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Middlesex Mutual Assurance Co. v. WalshSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- Griswold v. Union Labor Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- Healy v. WhiteSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1977
- Schmidt v. SchmidtSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Earl G. Smith, Administrator of the Estate of Gary Dean Smith, Deceased v. Metropolitan Property and Liability Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.