Legal Opinion

Jackson v. Master Holding Corp.

California Supreme Court

Decided December 30, 1940No. L. A. No. 17395PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

Plaintiff commenced this action on March 17, 1938, against defendants for fraud. Defendant Turlock Guarantee Building-Loan Association filed a general demurrer to the second amended complaint, which included the plea of the statute of limitations. Defendant El Portal Building-Loan Association filed a similar general demurrer, and also demurred specially upon the ground of uncertainty. Plaintiff’s counsel indicated that he did not desire to amend, and the demurrers were sustained without leave to amend. Judgment against plaintiff followed, and she then brought this appeal.

In order to…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Lady Washington Consolidated Co. v. WoodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Bainbridge v. StonerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Consolidated Reservoir & Power Co. v. ScarboroughCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Nighbert v. First National Bank of BakersfieldCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
  5. Turner v. LinerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Neff v. New York Life InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Allen v. RamsayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
  3. Richard A. Denholm v. Houghton Mifflin Company and the Riverside Publishing CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
  4. Weir v. SnowCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
  5. Hart v. GudgerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API