Legal Opinion

Turner v. Liner

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 24, 1939No. Civ. 10623PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CONLAN, J., pro tem.

T his action was brought by the plaintiffs for the recovery of damages and secret profits in a real estate trade, resulting from the possession by the defendants, who were the plaintiffs’ agents, of individual interests in the real estate traded which were adverse to those of the plaintiffs in the course of the transaction, without any knowledge thereof or consent thereto on the part of the plaintiffs.

A demurrer was interposed to plaintiffs’ complaint which was sustained. The plaintiffs filed an amended complaint to which another demurrer was addressed and which was…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Wood v. CarpenterSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  2. Lady Washington Consolidated Co. v. WoodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Victor Oil Co. v. DrumCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  4. Consolidated Reservoir & Power Co. v. ScarboroughCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
  5. Rutherford v. Rideout BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Bainbridge v. StonerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  2. Knapp v. KnappCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Mortimer v. LoynesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
  4. Peterson v. First National Bank of LanderWyoming Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Jackson v. Master Holding Corp.California Supreme Court · 1940

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API