Legal Opinion
Richard A. Denholm v. Houghton Mifflin Company and the Riverside Publishing Company
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided August 27, 1990No. 87-5987PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BRUNETTI, Circuit Judge:
Plaintiff-Appellant Richard Denholm (“Denholm”) sued his publisher, Houghton Mifflin Co. (“Houghton Mifflin”), and its wholly-owned subsidiary, Riverside Publishing Co. (“Riverside”) (collectively “Defendants-Appellees”), in Los Angeles Superior Court for tortious breach of contract and fraud arising out of a Letter Agreement to develop and publish a mathematics program for kindergarten through eighth grade. Appellees properly removed the case to the United States District Court for the Central District of California pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1441 & 1446, which had…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Foley v. Interactive Data Corp.California Supreme Court · 1988
- Dimick v. SchiedtSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Seaman's Direct Buying Service, Inc. v. Standard Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1984
- Hobart v. Hobart Estate Co.California Supreme Court · 1945
- Donovan v. Penn Shipping Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Lovell v. ChandlerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Soliman v. Philip Morris IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Legg v. Ulster CountyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2020
- Soliman v. Philip Morris Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2002
- Price v. Delaware Department of CorrectionDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1999
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.