Legal Opinion

New Amsterdam Casualty Co. v. Stecker

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided September 30, 1955PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHecht, J.

This is a motion for judgment on the pleadings and summary judgment.

Briefly stated the complaint sets forth that the defendants are husband and wife, residing in the State of New York; that the wife owns a motor vehicle, liability insurance for which was issued by the plaintiff; that the insurance policy does not contain any express provision pursuant to subdivision 3 of section 167 of the Insurance Law, which permits the inclusion of a spouse within the coverage of the policy; that Emanuel Stecker, the husband, was injured in an accident in Connecticut and that he is suing Molly Stecker in…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Coster v. CosterNew York Court of Appeals · 1943
  2. Fuchs v. London & Lancashire Indemnity Co. of AmericaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1940
  3. Williamson v. Massachusetts Bonding & InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1955
  4. Bradford v. Utica Mutual InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1943
  5. Bown Brothers, Inc. v. Merchants BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1926

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. General Accident Fire & Life Assurance Corp. v. GanserNew York Supreme Court · 1956
  2. New Amsterdam Casualty Co. v. SteckerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1956
  3. Maryland Casualty Company v. JacekDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1957
  4. General Accident Fire & Life Assurance Corp. v. JavianNew York Supreme Court · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API