New Amsterdam Casualty Co. v. Stecker
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the CourtHecht, J.
This is a motion for judgment on the pleadings and summary judgment.
Briefly stated the complaint sets forth that the defendants are husband and wife, residing in the State of New York; that the wife owns a motor vehicle, liability insurance for which was issued by the plaintiff; that the insurance policy does not contain any express provision pursuant to subdivision 3 of section 167 of the Insurance Law, which permits the inclusion of a spouse within the coverage of the policy; that Emanuel Stecker, the husband, was injured in an accident in Connecticut and that he is suing Molly Stecker in…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Coster v. CosterNew York Court of Appeals · 1943
- Fuchs v. London & Lancashire Indemnity Co. of AmericaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1940
- Williamson v. Massachusetts Bonding & InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1955
- Bradford v. Utica Mutual InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1943
- Bown Brothers, Inc. v. Merchants BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1926
3Cited by4 opinions
- General Accident Fire & Life Assurance Corp. v. GanserNew York Supreme Court · 1956
- New Amsterdam Casualty Co. v. SteckerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1956
- Maryland Casualty Company v. JacekDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1957
- General Accident Fire & Life Assurance Corp. v. JavianNew York Supreme Court · 1956