Legal Opinion
New Amsterdam Casualty Co. v. Stecker
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided June 12, 1956PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtValente, J.
In July, 1955, Molly Stecker, a resident of New York City, was the owner of an automobile and had automobile liability insurance issued by the plaintiff New Amsterdam Casualty Company. There was no express provision in the policy protecting her against liability in the event of injury to her husband, Emanuel Stecker.
On July 24, 1955, the insured and her husband were motoring in the State of Connecticut and became involved in an accident with another automobile. Her husband was injured and thereafter he instituted an action against his wife and the operator and owner of the other vehicle in…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Mertz v. MertzNew York Court of Appeals · 1936
- United States Mortgage & Trust Co. v. RugglesNew York Court of Appeals · 1932
- Fuchs v. London & Lancashire Indemnity Co. of AmericaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1940
- Stumpf v. HallahanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1905
- Stumpf v. . HallahanNew York Court of Appeals · 1906
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Travelers Insurance Co. v. American Fidelity & Cas. Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1958
- Harry M. Perrin v. Daniel PearlsteinCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1963
- Yankelevitz v. Royal Globe InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
- Maryland Casualty Company v. JacekDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1957
- Lastowski v. Norge Coin-O-Matic, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1974