Legal Opinion
General Accident Fire & Life Assurance Corp. v. Ganser
New York Supreme Court
Decided February 23, 1956PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMiles F. McDonald, J.
This is an action for a declaratory judgment seeking a determination of the rights and other legal relationships between the plaintiff and defendants under a policy of insurance and for an injunction restraining the defendant *20Rae Ganser as an individual from bringing any action against the plaintiff based upon the policy of insurance issued to the defendant’s intestate, Harry Ganser. The facts so far as pertinent to the issues involved are as follows:
On or about December 19, 1952, the plaintiff issued a policy of automobile liability insurance to the defendant’s intestate, Harry Ganser, which…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Mertz v. MertzNew York Court of Appeals · 1936
- Conklin v. Canadian-Colonial Airways, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1935
- Fuchs v. London & Lancashire Indemnity Co. of AmericaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1940
- Bakker v. Aetna Life Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1934
- Standard Accident Insurance v. NewmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1944
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- New Amsterdam Casualty Co. v. SteckerNew York Court of Appeals · 1957
- Munzer v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- Structural Dynamics Research Corp. v. Engineering Mechanics Research Corp.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1975
- Travelers Insurance Co. v. American Fidelity & Cas. Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1958
- Tickner v. Union Insurance CompanyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1968
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.