Williamson v. Massachusetts Bonding & Insurance
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Opinion of the CourtDaly, J.
The complaint as amended alleges the following facts: On July 12, 1949, the defendant, a ’Massachusetts corporation, in consideration of a premium paid to it, issued to Herman Williamson a policy insuring Mm against liaMlity to pay damages because of bodily injuries or death caused by accident arising out of the operation of his automobile. The policy was applied for and delivered in New York City, and the premiums were paid there. The policy provided that the defendant would pay any judgment rendered against the insured for a loss covered by it. The plaintiff is the wife of Herman…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Bushnell v. BushnellSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1925
- Coster v. CosterNew York Court of Appeals · 1943
- Fuchs v. London & Lancashire Indemnity Co. of AmericaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1940
- Norma Roberts Clement v. Atlantic Casualty Ins. Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1953
- Standard Accident Insurance v. NewmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1944
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Jenkins v. Indemnity Insurance Co. of North AmericaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1964
- Mosier v. CarneyMichigan Supreme Court · 1965
- Whitfield v. Empire Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1975
- Chasse v. AlbertSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1960
- Benzer v. Iowa Mutual Tornado Insurance Ass'nSupreme Court of Iowa · 1974
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.