Legal Opinion
Fuchs v. London & Lancashire Indemnity Co. of America
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided January 29, 1940PublishedCited by 37 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtClose, J.
The action is brought under section 109 of the Insurance Law to recover from an insurance carrier the amount due on an unsatisfied judgment entered in an action for personal injuries. The facts are unusual. On January 2, 1938, plaintiff sustained personal injuries “while riding as a passenger in an automobile owned and operated by one Hersch Fuchs. On January 10, 1938, she commenced an action against Fuchs in the Supreme Court, Bronx county, alleging negligence. Fuchs carried a $5,000 liability policy issued by the defendant, and defendant’s attorney appeared for Fuchs in the action. On…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Mertz v. MertzNew York Court of Appeals · 1936
- Rozell v. RozellNew York Court of Appeals · 1939
- Weatherwax v. Royal Indemnity Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1929
- 755 Seventh Avenue Corp. v. CarrollNew York Court of Appeals · 1935
3Cited by37 opinions
- New Amsterdam Casualty Co. v. SteckerNew York Court of Appeals · 1957
- Jacobs v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.New York Supreme Court · 1956
- Williamson v. Massachusetts Bonding & InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1955
- M & M Electric, Inc. v. Commercial Union Insurance Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- American Surety Co. v. DiamondNew York Court of Appeals · 1956
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.