Legal Opinion
Love v. Thomas
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided January 29, 1988No. 87-3866PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KOZINSKI, Circuit Judge:
Farmers and food processors in the Pacific Northwest brought this lawsuit to enjoin the Environmental Protection Agency from suspending registrations of the pesticide dinoseb (2-sec-butyl-4, 6-dinitrophe-nol). Plaintiffs use products containing dinoseb or its salts in the cultivation of green peas, snap beans, cucurbits and caneber-ries.1 As counsel for the State of Oregon dramatically proclaimed at oral argument, this case “essentially is ... about whether we’ll be able to have raspberries next year.”
Facts
The Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Camp v. PittsSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Florida Power & Light Co. v. LorionSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Northern Spotted Owl (Strix Occidentalis Caurina) v. HodelDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1988
- State v. ParkerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
- City of Boston v. United States Department of Housing and Urban DevelopmentCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
- National Coalition Against the Misuse of Pesticides v. Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1989
- Sierra Club v. MartinDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1998
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.