Legal Opinion

Swarner v. Mutual Benefit Group

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 18, 2013PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY BOWES, J.:

Rebecca Swarner commenced this declaratory judgment action against her automobile insurance carrier, Mutual Benefit Group d/b/a/ Mutual Benefit Insurance Co. (“Mutual Benefit”) to determine whether the household exclusion was applicable on largely stipulated facts to preclude under-insured motorists (“UIM”) benefits under that policy. Following discovery, both parties filed motions for summary judgment. The trial court granted summary judgment in favor of Mutual Benefit based on the household exclusion. After careful review, we find the exclusion inapplicable on the facts…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Standard Venetian Blind Co. v. American Empire InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  2. Madison Construction Co. v. Harleysville Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  3. Utica Mutual Insurance v. ContriscianeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  4. Donegal Mutual Insurance v. BaumhammersSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  5. Eichelman v. Nationwide InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Peters, M. v. National Interstate Insurance CompanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  2. QBE Insurance Corporation v. Walters, J.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
  3. General Refractories Co. v. First State InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2015
  4. Lomma v. Ohio Nat'l Life Assurance Corp.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2018
  5. Jeanne Jackson, of the Estate of Anthony J. Esposito, Jr. v. Quincy Mutual Fire Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2017

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API