Legal Opinion

Peters, M. v. National Interstate Insurance Compan

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 16, 2014No. 445 EDA 2014PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

PLATT, J.:

Appellants, National Interstate Insurance Company, and Evans Delivery Company, Inc., appeal from the order declaring that Appellees, Michael Peters and Malinda Peters, husband and wife, and Robert Weston, guardian of Jaden Peters (the Peters’ minor daughter), Ohio residents, could make a claim against National Interstate for under-insured motorist benefits (UIM) pursuant to the Pennsylvania Motor Vehicle Financial Responsibility Law (MVFRL) 1 for an accident in Ohio. 2 Appellees have no legally enforceable claim for UIM under Pennsylvania law. Accordingly, we vacate the…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Eichelman v. Nationwide InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  2. Chalkey v. RoushSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  3. Burstein v. Prudential Property & Casualty InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  4. Prudential Property & Casualty Insurance v. ColbertSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  5. Winslow-Quattlebaum v. Maryland Insurance GroupSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. General Refractories Co. v. First State InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2015
  2. Century Sur. Co. v. Essington Auto Ctr., LLCSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
  3. Affordable Outdoor, LLC v. Tri-Outdoor, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
  4. Nautilus Ins. Co. v. Motel Mgmt. Servs., Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2018
  5. Rarick v. Federated Serv. Ins. Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2018

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API