Goldsmith & Powell v. State
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
BOND, Chief Justice.
This suit was instituted by the State of Texas, through its Attorney General, Gerald C. Mann, against one hundred and fifty-five separate defendants, to enjoin them from polluting the waters of the Neches River. It is alleged that the defendants are. the owners of oil wells along the watershed of the river, and are permitting salt water to flow from their respective wells into the river, thus polluting it, destroying fish and vegetation, and rendering the water unfit for domestic purposes by individuals, and by the public generally.
The cause went to trial before a jury, as…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Hoefs v. ShortTexas Supreme Court · 1925
- Sun Oil Co. v. RobicheauxTexas Commission of Appeals · 1930
- City of Corsicana v. KingCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1928
- State of Texas v. PattersonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1896
- Cardwell v. AustinCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1914
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Ex Parte GenecovTexas Supreme Court · 1945
- Domel v. City of Georgetown, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1999
- Cummins v. Travis County Water Control & Improvement District No. 17, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2005
- Magnolia Petroleum Co. v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1949
- City of San Marcos v. Texas Commission on Environmental Quality, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2004
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.