Legal Opinion

Hoefs v. Short

Texas Supreme Court

Decided May 13, 1925No. 3068PublishedCited by 59 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Cureton

The locus of this controversy is in Reeves County, in the arid or semi-arid region, where irrigation is necessary for agricultural purposes. The parties will be designated as in the District Court. Suit was brought by J. C. Short against Otto Hoefs and three others of the same name, for the purpose of enjoining them from constueting a dam in Barilla Creek and diversion ditches therefrom, in such manner as to prevent the residue of the water in excess of 100 second feet from passing down the channel of the creek to the dam and ditches of the plaintiff, located below and north of those of the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. McClure v. City of Red WingSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1881
  2. Giddings v. DayTexas Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Gulp, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 1888
  4. West v. TaylorOregon Supreme Court · 1888
  5. Hoefs v. ShortCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1916

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by59 opinions

  1. State of Texas v. BradfordTexas Supreme Court · 1932
  2. The Texas Co. v. BurkettTexas Supreme Court · 1927
  3. Oklahoma Water Resources Board v. Central Oklahoma Master Conservancy DistrictSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1969
  4. Texas Woman's University v. Methodist Hospital, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2006
  5. Heard v. Town of RefugioTexas Supreme Court · 1937

54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API