Legal Opinion

State of Texas v. Patterson

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided October 7, 1896PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NEILL, Associate Justice.

The State of Texas, through the District Attorney of the Thirty-fourth Judicial District, procured the issuance of a writ of injunction, which, upon hearing, was dissolved, upon the ground that the bill therefor disclosed no such equities as entitled her to a perpetuation of the injunction.

The third count of the bill, upon which the State now relies, is in substance as follows:

On May 1, 1895, the defendant, J. J. Taylor, had the management and control of certain premises in the city of El Paso, Texas, known as the Gem Building; that about said date he leased and…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. In Re DebsSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  2. City of Georgetown v. THE ALEXANDRIA CANAL COMPANY, &C.Supreme Court of the United States · 1838
  3. Coosaw Mining Co. v. South CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  4. State v. GoodnightTexas Supreme Court · 1888
  5. Cope v. District Fair Ass'nIllinois Supreme Court · 1881

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Ex Parte Emory H. HughesTexas Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Featherstone v. Independent Service Station Ass'n of TexasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1928
  3. Goldsmith & Powell v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1942
  4. Campbell v. PeacockCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1915
  5. Harris v. O'ConnorCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1944

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API