Harleysville Mutual Insurance v. State
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Toal
This Court accepted the petition of Harleysville Mutual Insurance Company (Petitioner) in its Original Jurisdiction to assess constitutional challenges to Act No. 26 of the South Carolina Acts and Joint Resolutions, which regulates coverage provided by commercial general liability (CGL) insurance policies for construction-related work. Act No. 26, 2011 S.C. Acts 88 [hereinafter Act. No. 26]. We hold that the retroactivity clause of Act No. 261 violates the Contract Clauses of the state and federal Constitutions, and that the statute may only apply prospectively to CGL insurance contracts…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- General Motors Corp. v. RomeinSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Hodges v. RaineySupreme Court of South Carolina · 2000
- Steinke v. South Carolina Department of Labor, Licensing & RegulationSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1999
- Joytime Distributors & Amusement Co. v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1999
- Crossmann Communities of North Carolina, Inc. v. Harleysville Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2011
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Pinnacle Group, Inc. v. Erie Insurance Property & Casualty Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 2013
- Auto-Owners Insurance v. RhodesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2013
- Beatty v. RawskiDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2015
- Kirven v. Central States Health & Life Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2014
- Dunbar Jr. v. StonebreakerDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2025
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.