Legal Opinion
Crossmann Communities of North Carolina, Inc. v. Harleysville Mutual Insurance
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Decided August 22, 2011No. 26909PublishedCited by 64 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Kittredge
In this commercial general liability (“CGL”) policy dispute, we issued an opinion on January 7, 2011, finding no coverage. We subsequently granted a rehearing petition and received numerous amici briefs. Today, we withdraw our initial opinion and issue this opinion, finding the CGL policies provide coverage for the stipulated progressive property damages.
Appellant/Respondent Harleysville Mutual Insurance Company (“Harleysville”) issued a series of standard CGL policies to the Respondent developers or their predecessors (collectively “Crossmann”) for a series of condominium projects in the…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Montrose Chemical Corp. v. Admiral InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- Travelers Indemnity Co. of America v. Moore & Associates, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2007
- Owens-Illinois, Inc. v. United InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1994
- Sentinel Insurance Co. v. First Insurance Co. of Hawai'i, Ltd.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1994
- United States Fire Insurance v. J.S.U.B., Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 2007
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by64 opinions
- Greystone Construction, Inc. v. National Fire & Marine InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011
- Williams v. Government Employees InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2014
- U.S. Metals, Incorporated v. Liberty Mutual Group, Incorporated, Doing Business as Liberty Insurance CorporationTexas Supreme Court · 2015
- Lennar Corp. v. Markel American Insurance Co.Texas Supreme Court · 2013
- K & L Homes, Inc. v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.