Legal Opinion

Kirven v. Central States Health & Life Co.

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided June 25, 2014No. Appellate Case No. 2013-000273; No. 27403PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CERTIFIED QUESTIONS ANSWERED

Justice KITTREDGE.

We certified the following questions from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina:

1. Can the definition of “actual charges” contained within S.C.Code Ann. Section 38-71-242 be applied to insurance contracts executed prior to the statute’s effective dates?

2. Can the South Carolina Department of Insurance mandate the application of “actual charges” definition in S.C.Code Ann. Section 38-71-242 to policies already in existence on the statute’s effective dates by prohibiting an insurance company from paying claims absent…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Landgraf v. USI Film ProductsSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. Calder v. BullSupreme Court of the United States · 1798
  3. United States Trust Co. of NY v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. Rivers v. Roadway Express, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1994
  5. In Re Marriage of BouquetCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Michael Moshoures v. City of North Myrtle BeachCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2025
  2. Estate of Richard W. Meier v. Mary J. BurnsedSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API