Legal Opinion
Joytime Distributors & Amusement Co. v. State
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Decided October 14, 1999No. 25007PublishedCited by 90 opinions
1Per curiam
This matter is pending in the Court’s original jurisdiction. Plaintiff (Joytime) is a South Carolina corporation engaged in the video gaming industry with gaming machines located in several South Carolina counties. Joytime seeks a declaration as to the constitutionality of Act No. 125, 1999 S.C.Acts. Joytime asserts that Part II of Act 125 is an unconstitutional delegation of power by the legislature to the voters of this State and asks the Court to enjoin the enforcement of Act 125. The State has filed a brief contending that Act 125 is constitutional and, if not, the Act is severable. We…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Barto v. . HimrodNew York Court of Appeals · 1853
- The Cargo of the Brig Aurora, Burn Side v. The United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1813
- Berkebile v. OutenSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1993
- State Ex Rel. Richards v. MoorerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1929
- Diversified Investment Partnership v. Department of Social & Health ServicesWashington Supreme Court · 1989
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by90 opinions
- Amalgamated Transit Union Local 587 v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 2000
- Curtis v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2001
- In Re the Treatment & Care of LuckabaughSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2002
- Sloan v. South Carolina Board of Physical Therapy ExaminersSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2006
- Sloan v. Greenville CountyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2003
85 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.