Legal Opinion
Triangle Ranch, Inc. v. Union Oil Co.
California Court of Appeal
Decided September 13, 1955No. Civ. 20966PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWhite, P. J.
This is an appeal by plaintiff from a judgment of dismissal entered following an order of the court sustaining defendants’ demurrer to all three causes of action set forth in plaintiff’s second amended complaint, without leave to amend the first cause of action and with leave to amend the second and third causes of action. Subsequent to said order, counsel for plaintiff wrote to defendants’ attorneys in part as follows:
“In the above matter it has been decided not to further amend the complaint.
“Accordingly, we request that a judgment of dismissal be entered so that the matter may be reviewed…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Lockard v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
- Werner v. GrahamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
- Temescal Water Co. v. Department of Public WorksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
- Wheeler v. GreggCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
- Livingston Rock & Gravel Co. v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Scott v. City of Indian WellsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
- Adler v. City CouncilCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
- Department of Fish & Game v. Anderson-Cottonwood Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
- Gong v. City of FremontCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
- Riley v. Bear Creek Planning CommitteeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.