Legal Opinion

Stellar v. State Farm General Insurance

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 27, 2007No. B195728PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

DOI TODD, Acting P. J.

Plaintiffs and appellants Richard and Miles Stellar appeal from a grant of summary judgment entered in favor of defendant and respondent State Farm General Insurance Company (State Farm). The trial court ruled that no triable issue of fact existed and that State Farm was entitled to judgment as a matter of law. We affirm. The undisputed evidence established that State Farm owed no duty to defend appellants in a defamation action brought against them.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

State Farm issued a homeowners insurance policy (policy) to Richard and Nuala…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Waller v. Truck Insurance Exchange, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Montrose Chemical Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  3. MacKinnon v. Truck Insurance ExchangeCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Geddes & Smith, Inc. v. Saint Paul Mercuy Indemnity Co.California Supreme Court · 1959
  5. Powerine Oil Co., Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Delgado v. Interinsurance Exchange of the Automobile Club of Southern CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Total Call International, Inc. v. Perless InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
  3. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
  4. Francis v. Allstate InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2012
  5. Medina v. GEICO Indemnity Co.California Court of Appeal · 2017

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API