Legal Opinion

Medina v. GEICO Indemnity Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 8, 2017No. F072548PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

GOMES, J.

—Leigh Anne Flores was involved in an accident while driving a van her employer, Pacific Bell Telephone Company, had furnished to her to perform her duties, but which she used for both business and personal purposes. At the time of the accident, Flores was running a personal errand during her workday. As a result of the accident, Javier Medina, the driver of the car she hit, sued Flores and Pacific Bell for damages. In that action, the trial court found Pacific Bell, who self-insured the van, was not vicariously liable for Flores’s actions as she was not acting in the course…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Di Orio v. New Jersey Manufacturers Insurance CompanySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1979
  2. Pacific Automobile Insurance v. LewisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
  3. Jurd v. Pacific Indemnity Co.California Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Comunale v. Traders & General InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
  5. Juzefski v. Western Casualty & Surety Co.California Court of Appeal · 1959

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Mosley v. Pacific Specialty Ins. Co.California Court of Appeal · 2020
  2. Mosley v. Pacific Specialty Ins. Co.California Court of Appeal · 2020
  3. Nargizyan v. State Farm Gen. Insurance Co.California Court of Appeal · 2026
  4. Rivera v. Fidelity National Title Insurance etc. CA5California Court of Appeal · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API