Legal Opinion

In Re Blood Reagents Antitrust Litigation

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided April 8, 2015No. 12-4067PublishedCited by 79 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

SCIRICA, Circuit Judge.

The principal issues in this appeal under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23(f) in this antitrust action are (1) whether Rule 23 requires scrutiny under Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 509 U.S. 579, 113 S.Ct. 2786, 125 L.Ed.2d 469 (1993), of challenged expert testimony and (2) the propriety of class certification in light of the Supreme Court’s decision in Comcast Corp. v. Behrend, - U.S. -, 133 S.Ct. 1426, 185 L.Ed.2d 515 (2013) (Comcast), which re versed Behrend v. Comcast Corp., 655 F.3d 182 (3d Cir.2011) {Behrend), after the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. DukesSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  3. General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. FalconSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Comcast Corp. v. BehrendSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  5. Ellis v. Costco Wholesale Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by79 opinions

  1. Neale v. Volvo Cars of North America, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2015
  2. In Re National Football League Players Concussion Injury LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2016
  3. Sali ex rel. Themselves v. Corona Reg'l Med. Ctr.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
  4. Reynaldo Reyes v. NetdepositCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2015
  5. Alex Reinig v. RBS Citizens NACourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2018

74 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API