Legal Opinion
Alex Reinig v. RBS Citizens NA
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided December 31, 2018No. 17-3464PublishedCited by 88 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
VANASKIE, Circuit Judge.
This interlocutory appeal authorized by Rule 23(f) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure presents us with two significant questions. First, did the District Court err in certifying a class of Citizens Bank (N.A.) Mortgage Loan Officers from ten different states who bring claims alleging that they were unlawfully denied overtime pay? And second, may we exercise pendent appellate jurisdiction over the District Court's order certifying a collective action under § 216(b) of the Fair Labor Standards Act ("FLSA"), 29 U.S.C. § 216 (b), an otherwise non-appealable order? We…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. DukesSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Swint v. Chambers County CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Genesis HealthCare Corp. v. SymczykSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- Tyson Foods, Inc. v. BouaphakeoSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by88 opinions
- Daniel Ferreras v. American Airlines IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2019
- James Dennis v. City of PhiladelphiaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2021
- Jamie Huber v. Simons Agency IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2023
- United States v. Robert BraceCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2021
- Paul O'Hanlon v. Uber Technologies IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2021
83 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.