Legal Opinion

Filipetti v. Department of Fish & Wildlife

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided November 26, 2008No. CV07100348; A137191PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHaselton, P. J.

Defendant, Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife (ODFW), appeals from a trial court order directing ODFW to return to plaintiffs, James Filipetti and Francesca Mantei, one black-tailed doe named “Snowball” (the doe). After the doe had been seized from plaintiffs’ property pursuant to a search warrant, plaintiffs sought to recover the doe by filing a motion under ORS 133.633 for “return or restoration of things seized.” The trial court granted that motion, and, on appeal, ODFW contends that the court erred because plaintiffs failed to establish a “valid claim to rightful possession” of the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. State v. StamperCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
  3. State v. StamperOregon Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Owens v. Motor Vehicles DivisionOregon Supreme Court · 1994
  5. State v. RodriguezCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. CivilCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2017
  2. Waxman v. Waxman & Associates, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
  3. State v. StraughanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
  4. State v. FentonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2018
  5. State v. EhrensingCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API