Legal Opinion

State v. Straughan

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided May 29, 2014No. MI080265; A147718PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSercombe, J.

Following a bench trial, the trial court imposed a punitive contempt sanction. ORS 33.065. Defendant appeals, assigning error to the trial court’s denial of his motion to dismiss for lack of a speedy trial under former ORS 135.747 (2011), repealed by Or Laws 2013, ch 431, § 1. On review for errors of law, State v. Johnson, 339 Or 69, 82-87, 116 P3d 879 (2005), we reverse and remand for entry of a judgment of dismissal.

Because this case proceeded to trial along with three misdemeanor cases brought against defendant — one of which is the subject of another appeal we decide today in State v.…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. State v. GainesOregon Supreme Court · 2009
  2. State v. JohnsonOregon Supreme Court · 2005
  3. State v. AdamsOregon Supreme Court · 2005
  4. State v. RobinsonOregon Supreme Court · 1959
  5. State v. GLUSHKOOregon Supreme Court · 2011

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. State v. WashingtonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
  2. State v. BlevinsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
  3. State v. WendtCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
  4. State v. BurketteCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
  5. State v. EllisCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API