Legal Opinion

State v. Fenton

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided September 12, 2018No. A160092PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHadlock, J.

*49In this procedurally idiosyncratic criminal case, defendant was convicted of conspiracy to commit fourth-degree assault. He appeals an amended judgment that requires him, as a special condition of probation, to forfeit seven firearms that law-enforcement officers seized when they executed a search warrant. Defendant argues both that the state failed to follow required criminal-forfeiture procedures and that the trial court could not properly impose forfeiture as a condition of his probation. In response, the state asserts that defendant's challenge to the forfeiture is not properly before…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State v. AinsworthOregon Supreme Court · 2009
  2. State v. BranstetterOregon Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Filipetti v. Department of Fish & WildlifeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
  4. Young v. PetersonOregon Supreme Court · 1987
  5. State ex rel. Juvenile Department v. VockrodtCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Harlukowicz v. State of OregonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2023
  2. Moodenbaugh v. OSPCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2025
  3. Moodenbaugh v. OSPCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2025
  4. State v. Diaz-AvalosCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API