Legal Opinion

State v. Ehrensing

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided February 27, 2013No. 06CR2338FE; A146027PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHaselton, C. J.

The Douglas County Sheriff appeals two orders directing him to return a portion of usable, packaged marijuana—which had been seized from defendant’s property pursuant to a search warrant—to defendant, defendant’s wife, and three individuals, all of whom hold registry identification cards pursuant to the Oregon Medical Marijuana Act (OMMA). ORS 475.300 - 475.346. Defendant cross-appeals, assigning error to the court’s denial of his motion for attorney fees predicated on ORS 20.105. For reasons amplified below, we conclude with respect to the appeal that (1) under the circumstances of this…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. State v. GainesOregon Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Stull v. HokeOregon Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Emerald Steel Fabricators, Inc. v. BOLI OF LABOR AND INDUSTRIESOregon Supreme Court · 2010
  5. United States v. Edward Rosenthal, United States of America v. Edward RosenthalCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. People v. CrouseColorado Court of Appeals · 2013
  2. BRCC Enterprises LLC v. Jesse Skie, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2024
  3. People v. CrouseColorado Court of Appeals · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API