Legal Opinion

McMillen v. Industrial Commission

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided November 30, 1920PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Error: Court of Appeals for Columbiana county.

1Opinion of the CourtMetcalfe, J.

The question in this case is raised by demurrer to the petition. The facts alleged in the petition are: That Overlander, McMillen & Company is a partnership consisting of three members, of whom the plaintiff, A. K. McMillen, is one; that the business of the company is thé construction of improved roads in Columbiana county, under the employment of the st&te highway commission and the county commissioners; that the capital of the company was contributed in equal amounts by the members of the firm; that each member is to share equally in the profits and losses; that it was agreed between the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Cooper v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
  2. McCosker & Molloy v. BanksCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1896
  3. Stewart v. KatzCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1869
  4. Boyd v. Thompson & CoxeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1893
  5. People v. StraussAppellate Court of Illinois · 1901

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. NealSupreme Court of Georgia · 1939
  2. Berger v. Fidelity Union Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1927
  3. Dezendorf v. National Casualty Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1936
  4. Gebers v. Murfreesboro Laundry Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1929
  5. In Re W. A. Montgomery & SonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1930

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API