Legal Opinion
Gebers v. Murfreesboro Laundry Co.
Tennessee Supreme Court
Decided April 13, 1929PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice McKinney
The trial court was correct in holding* that a member of1 a partnership, who receives wages for his services, is not an employee within the purview of our Compensation Act. Cooper v. Industrial Acc. Commission, 177 Cal., 685; Employers’ Liability Assur. Corp. v. Industrial Acc. Commission, 187 Cal., 615, 203 P., 95; Rockefeller v. Industrial Commission, 58 Utah, 124, 197 P., 1038; McMillen v. Industrial Commission, 13 Ohio App., 310; Bowne v. S. W. Bowne Co., 221 N. Y., 28; Lyle v. Lyle Cider & Vinegar Co. (N. Y.), 47 A. L. R., 840; Millers’ Indemnity Underwriters v. Patten (Tex. App.), 25 A.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Claim of Bowne v. S. W. Bowne Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1917
- Odom v. Sanford & TreadwayTennessee Supreme Court · 1927
- Cooper v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
- Rockefeller v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1921
- Employers' Liability Assurance Corp. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Lindsey v. Smith and Johnson, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1980
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. NealSupreme Court of Georgia · 1939
- International-Great Northern R. Co. v. LucasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1938
- Ryder's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1961
- Dezendorf v. National Casualty Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1936
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.