Legal Opinion
Dezendorf v. National Casualty Co.
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided December 11, 1936No. 5373PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DREW, Judge.
Plaintiff filed this suit under the Workmen’s Compensation Act of this state (No. 20 of 1914, as amended) claiming the maximum amount of compensation for a period of not more than 400 weeks. He made defendants the National Casualty Company and the partnership of Prud-homme & Dezendorf, an ordinary partnership, composed of Prudhomme and the plaintiff. His claim is based upon the allegation that he was an employee of the partnership at the time of the accident and injury.
Among the defenses set up by defendants is that plaintiff cannot claim and collect compensation from the…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Hartigan v. . Casualty Co. of AmericaNew York Court of Appeals · 1919
- Claim of Bowne v. S. W. Bowne Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1917
- Ohio Drilling Co. v. State Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
- Millers' Indemnity Underwriters v. PattenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1922
- Claim of Lyle v. H. R. Lyle Cider & Vinegar Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1926
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Trappey v. Lumbermen's Mutual Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1956
- Harper v. RagusLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1952
- Ryder's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1961
- Pederson v. PedersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1949
- Rasmussen v. Trico Feed MillsNebraska Supreme Court · 1947
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.