Legal Opinion
In Re W. A. Montgomery & Son
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided February 7, 1930No. 13,979PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtNichols, J.
Under the provisions of §61 of the Workmen’s Compensation Act of 1929 (Acts 1929 p. 536), the Industrial Board of Indiana has certified to this court questions of law based upon the following statement of' facts presented in a proceeding now pending before such board, and requests the opinion of the court for guidance in determining such proceedings:
Statement of Facts.
On March 29, 1929, and prior thereto, Wilbur A. Montgomery and his son Floyd C. Montgomery were operating as partners in the firm name of “W. A. Montgomery and Son,” and were engaged in the general garage business, in which,…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Ohio Drilling Co. v. State Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
- Claim of Lyle v. H. R. Lyle Cider & Vinegar Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1926
- Cooper v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
- Rockefeller v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1921
- Employers' Liability Assurance Corp. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. NealSupreme Court of Georgia · 1939
- Hays v. State Ex Rel. Wyoming Workers' Compensation DivisionWyoming Supreme Court · 1989
- Ryder's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1961
- Dezendorf v. National Casualty Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1936
- Jernigan v. Clark and Day Exploration CompanyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1959
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.